Within the last year I have been engaged in several of MRP jobs; approaches to help drive production operations. The majority of these projects have involved working together with companies who’ve already done the difficult job of establishing, installing and selecting the program. In the same way, employees have been educated – it's ready to go live!
Therefore, if a company is still working in insanity and / or isn’t achieving the results required from a system such as this, well there&# 1 39;s a difficulty! However, what’s the situation? In my experience it’s often lack of #39;buy ' into the job by senior members of staff.
And yes, this really will make all of the difference.
If senior managers aren’t involved with daily use of this machine, how do they hold individuals accountable? By becoming involved, I don’t mean job transactions in the machine, ie raising purchase orders. I mean they are involved with the stream of data at any level.
In case your senior team aren’t 'observable ' about the machine you then risk a decrease of criteria for your company. Like the vacant warehouse windows which have smashed by vandals when minor fixes aren’t deal with *, too little management existence doesn’t help decent system areas to be preserved.
I’ve heard tales of senior folks demonstrating they don’t utilize their personal computer system (since they believe they shouldn’t have it or to 's a badge of #39;achievement '-RRB-. These tales pervade the business and it doesn’t help users get excited.
One solution to get over the problem of senior penis 'buy ' would be to utilize a Sunrise format. ) Sunrise meetings are a excellent method of bringing together key players in the company at the beginning of every working day. Priority data is united together and assessed. When it isn’t appropriate then there’s a demand for action.
The direct utilization of an ERP / MRP outputs is a fantastic way testing the standard of your system's info, in addition to helping direct small business attempts. When a package of management accounts are a part of the mix there’s more opportunity for the senior staff to become involved. They will realize how well the machine is functioning and the effect this is having.
I recall one event during my period in Operations Management. There’d been a gradual uptake within portion of our ERP system. I had been unable to have interest from the groups, to help solve this, so traffic my supervisor. After part education, part researching part and opportunities begging, I purchased him around. The result was a strategy.
My boss made a decision to stop spoon feeding the store floor with information and cause them to become self explanatory; if they didn’t utilize the machine they wouldn’t obtain their information. Their system would function, if they had a reason to use it. This information then fed our Sunrise meetings and it worked superbly. Our system became equally self-sustaining and potent.
When creating your MRP system it’s vital that the ideal senior individuals are engaging in the ideal type of means. In my experience, the jobs that have been debilitating are those in which the senior staff have investigated becoming involved. Whether they believed it was under them, they had been too busy, or anything different, all I could report on will be the outcomes. And these are awful when the senior staff isn’t pro-actively participated.
Inversely, the jobs which have gone (comparatively ) like a fantasy, have had the ideal support from the older group. They know the benefits of MRP, what they had to do to make the ideal atmosphere for it to operate, and how they may use the system to their own advantage.
The outcomes, as they say, speak for themselves.
If your machine isn’t where it ought to be, along with your senior staff isn’t fully participated, then not trying between them using a meeting and see whether this approach works?
* In case you have not heard of 'Broken Window Theory' and how it influences standards and discipline, check out this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broken_windows_theory